71. How USAID's exit could reshape northern Kenya's conservancies
- Author:
- Caleb Braham, Ceciliah Njagi, Emma Bostrup, Eric Kioko, and Jane Mutune
- Publication Date:
- 04-2026
- Content Type:
- Policy Brief
- Institution:
- Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS)
- Abstract:
- USAID’s withdrawal is reshaping green transition initiatives across Africa. In northern Kenya, the Northern Rangelands Trust was hit immediately – highlighting dynamics likely to emerge wherever donor‑dependent environmental institutions operate. The Northern Rangelands Trust (NRT) is a nonprofit umbrella organisation supporting 47 community conservancies in northern and coastal Kenya, as well as parts of Uganda. Since its founding in 2004, the organisation has operated under the motto ‘Transforming lives, conserving nature.’ Today, it employs more than 1,300 people and claims to benefit over 700,000 individuals. Over the past decade USAID has been one of the NRT’s key donors. Internal financial summaries indicate cooperative agreements totalling approximately USD 34 million, of which around USD 13 million had been disbursed prior to the 2025 suspension. The funding freeze occurs at a time when the NRT is already under intense scrutiny. The organisation has faced repeated allegations of human rights abuses and violations of community land rights linked to its conservation and security activities. These controversies reflect broader tensions surrounding international conservation and development partnerships in northern Kenya, where land disputes have generated legal challenges and local opposition. In 2025, the Environment and Land Court of Kenya ruled that the NRT’s establishment of the Biliqo Bulesa and Cherab conservancies violated community land rights, highlighting the legal and procedural risks associated with such interventions. Despite these criticisms, the NRT leadership and its remaining donors continue to support the conservancy model as an appropriate mechanism for conservation and local development. As noted by a senior NRT officer: ‘You won’t get 100 percent of people supporting the conservancy model. Ten to fifteen percent may oppose it due to different interests, and competitors focus on that ten percent.’ This underscores the diversity of community interests and the contested character of conservancy governance. The NRT and its member conservancies oversee more than 10% of Kenya’s land area and perform functions typically associated with the state, including education and security provision. The withdrawal of USAID funding may therefore trigger substantial programmatic cuts and operational downsizing, with immediate repercussions for local communities and rangeland governance, especially in newer conservancies that lack financial self-sufficiency and are not integrated into carbon credit projects.
- Topic:
- Foreign Policy, Environment, Natural Resources, USAID, Development Policy, and Global Economy
- Political Geography:
- Kenya and Africa