|
|
|
|
|
|
CIAO DATE: 11/05
Angels and Dragons: Asia, the UN, reform and the next Secretary-General
Michael Fullilove
July 29, 2005
Abstract
The relationship between the UN and Asia can seem unfamiliar and distant. Most of
New York’s energy is consumed by the Middle East and Africa rather than Northeast,
South and Southeast Asia; the international organisation can seem Atlanticist in
orientation. On the other side of the Pacifi c Ocean the strict view of state sovereignty
adopted by many Asian capitals leads them to keep the UN at arm’s length. As always,
however, the story is more complex: we need to differentiate between the UN’s work
in Asia on the one hand, and Asian behaviour at the UN on the other. Since 1945,
the UN has contributed to the Asian security order but only at the margins, its
security role circumscribed by power politics and Asian approaches to security. By
contrast, Asian states have always been keen to exercise their prerogatives in New
York, viewing their UN activities as a marker of sovereignty and a source of prestige.
The Brief reviews this history and sets out the current stances of the three major
regional powers — China, India, and Japan — towards the UN.
The next eighteen months will be an important period in UN-Asia relations. A
reform process is underway in which Asian states are playing an infl uential role,
and Kofi Annan’s successor as Secretary-General is expected to be an Asian. It is
argued here that the historical tension in the relationship is evident in contemporary
reform discussions, with Asian states more focused on Security Council reform
than on those reforms that might conceivably involve the UN more deeply in Asian
security issues. Not all capitals are behaving in predictable ways, however. This
Issues Brief previews the September World Summit on UN reform and examines the
prospects for an Asian Secretary-General, which could thicken Asia’s interactions
with the UN.
Full text (PDF, 26 pages, 237.6 KB)