|
|
|
Email this citationCIAO DATE: 7/5/2006
An International Architecture for the Post-Kyoto Era
Sheila Olmstead, Robert Stavins
March 2006
Abstract
In February, 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change came into force, but without participation by the United States. Its impacts on emissions of greenhouse gases — including carbon dioxide (CO2) , the primary anthropogenic driver of climate change — will be trivial; but scientific (Robert T. Watson 2001) and economic analyses (Charles D. Kolstad and Michael A. Toman 2001) point to the need for a credible international approach.
Because the Kyoto Protocol’s ambitious targets apply only to the short term (2008-2012) and only to industrialized nations, the agreement will impose relatively high costs and generate only modest short-term benefits while failing to provide a real solution (Joseph E. Aldy et al. 2003). For these reasons, most economists see the agreement as deeply flawed (Richard N. Cooper 1998; David G. Victor 2001; Warwick J. McKibbin and Peter J. Wilcoxen 2002), although some see it as an acceptable first step (Axel Michaelowa 2003). Virtually all agree, however, that the Protocol is not sufficient to the overall challenge.
We describe the basic features of a post-Kyoto international global climate agreement, which addresses three crucial questions: who, when, and how. The respective elements are: first, a means to ensure that key nations — industrialized and developing — are involved; second, an emphasis on an extended time path of action (employing a cost-effective pattern over time); and third, inclusion of market-based policy instruments.
