Search

Search Constraints

Begin New Search You searched for: Topic Defense Policy Remove constraint Topic: Defense Policy Political Geography Russia Remove constraint Political Geography: Russia Content Type Special Report Remove constraint Content Type: Special Report

Search Results

1. Europe’s Indo-Pacific Tilt: Estonian and Japanese Interests

2. Assessing the Evolving Russian Nuclear Threat

3. How the United States Should Respond if Russia Invades Ukraine

4. The geopolitical implications of Russia's invasion of Ukraine

5. Deciding the future: the Australian Army and the infantry fighting vehicle

6. ‘Impactful projection’: long-range strike options for Australia

7. The Challenge of European Political Will

8. Facing War: Rethinking Europe’s Security and Defence

9. Of Ships and Cyber: Transposing the Incidents at Sea Agreement

10. Baltic Conflict: Russia’s Goal to Distract NATO?

11. Military Stockpiles: A Life-Insurance Policy in a High-Intensity Conflict?

12. Turkey's Response to the Russia-Ukraine Crisis

13. American Interests in the Ukraine War

14. One-Size-Fits-None: Overhauling JADC2 to Prioritize the Warfighter and Exploit Adversaries’ Weaknesses

15. Prepare Ukraine for Victory in a Long War

16. Russia Can Still Be Defeated, But Time Is Short

17. How to Strengthen US Deterrence and Weaken the Attempts of Rival Nuclear Coercion

18. NATO Needs a New Strategy for the Baltic Sea

19. Russia Futures: Three Trajectories

20. The Impact of Finland's and Sweden's Accession to NATO on the Security of the Alliance

21. China's Foreign Policies Today: Who Is in Charge of What

22. Putin’s Next, Best Move – The Logic and Limits of Russian Action on Ukraine

23. Meeting Antarctica’s diplomatic challenges: Joint approaches for Australia and the United States

24. Modernizing the Nuclear Triad: Decline or Renewal?

25. Improving Joint Operational Concept Development within the U.S. Department of Defense

26. Re-thinking Coalitions: The United States in a World of Great Power Competition

27. Putin Prioritizes Syria. Biden Should Too.

28. A strategic concept for countering Russian and Chinese hybrid threats

29. Geometries of deterrence: Assessing defense arrangements in Europe’s northeast

30. Turkey's NATO Future: Between alliance dependency, Russia, and strategic autonomy

31. The Sputnik Moment: Historic Lessons for Our Hypersonic Age

32. Reducing Russia-NATO Tensions: Codes for Unplanned Encounters at Sea

33. The Assumptions of the New U.S. “Defense Space Strategy”

34. Security Threats, American Pressure, and the Role of Key Personnel: How NATO’s Defence Planning Process is Alleviating the Burden-Sharing Dilemma

35. Parameters VOL. 49 NO. 1–2 Spring–Summer 2019

36. Maneuver and Manipulation: On the Military Strategy of Online Information Warfare

37. Grand Strategy is Attrition: The Logic of Integrating Various Forms of Power in Conflict

38. The Army Role in Achieving Deterrence in Cyberspace

39. What Next for Russia’s Front-Line States?

40. Regards sur l’Eurasie - L'année politique 2018

41. IFPA National Security Update 10: The Military Applications and Use of Artificial Intelligence

42. IFPA National Security Update 7: The 2019 Missile Defense Review - Strengths and Weaknesses

43. Iraqi-Russian Relations amidst US Security-Focused Engagement

44. The Expanding China-Russia Defense Partnership

45. Not Enough Maritime Capability: The Challenge of Reinforcing Europe

46. Beating the Americans at Their Own Game: An Offset Strategy with Chinese Characteristics

47. The Russian Orthodox Church: Faith, Power and Conquest

48. IFPA National Security Update 6: The Trump Administration's Space Force

49. Macron, Diplomat: A New French Foreign Policy?

50. After Crimea: The future of Nordic Defence Cooperation

51. First on the Front Lines – the Role of Volunteers in Countering Russia’s Military Aggression against Ukraine

52. Russia’s Electronic Warfare Capabilities to 2025: Challenging NATO in the Electromagnetic Spectrum

53. NATO’s Future: A Tale of Three Summits

54. What Are Nuclear Weapons For? Recommendations for Restructuring U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces